The Blog

NoodleFood

Podcast #74: Prisoner’s Dilemma, Revenge, Building Codes, and More

 Posted by on 10 May 2011 at 9:00 am  Podcasts
May 102011
 

On Sunday’s episode of Philosophy in Action Radio, Greg Perkins and I answered questions on reasoning from the Prisoner’s Dilemma, hiring people with an internet presence, the morality and limits of revenge, building codes, numbers of men versus women in Objectivism, wealth creation, and more. The podcast of that episode is now available for streaming or downloading.

You can automatically download podcasts of Philosophy in Action Radio by subscribing to Philosophy in Action’s Podcast RSS Feed:


Whole Podcast: 8 May 2011

Listen or Download:

Remember the Tip Jar!

The mission of Philosophy in Action is to spread rational principles for real life… far and wide. That’s why the vast majority of my work is available to anyone, free of charge. I love doing the radio show, but each episode requires an investment of time, effort, and money to produce. So if you enjoy and value that work of mine, please contribute to the tip jar. I suggest $5 per episode or $20 per month, but any amount is appreciated. In return, contributors can request that I answer questions from the queue pronto, and regular contributors enjoy free access to premium content and other goodies.


Podcast Segments: 8 May 2011

You can download or listen to my answers to individual questions from this episode below.

Introduction

My News of the Week: Here’s what’s on my plate of late. Last week, I testified in defense of free speech at hearing on Colorado’s campaign finance laws. I’m still working on my updates to Explore Atlas Shrugged. This week, I’m going to be working on my two lectures on pride for ATLOSCon. And here’s the video of my short talk on Cookie Cutter Medicine.

Question 1: Reasoning from the Prisoner’s Dilemma

Question: What do you think of the “Prisoner’s Dilemma”? Something about the Prisoner’s Dilemma as a basis for economic and ethical claims never settled with me, but I’m not sure why. What is your opinion of it from a philosophical point of view?

My Answer, In Brief: The Prisoner’s Dilemma cannot be used as a basis for ethical or economic reasoning, because it’s a narrow case that only confirms some more fundamental principles of justice and cooperation.

Listen or Download:

Links:

To comment on this question or my answer, visit its comment thread.

Question 2: Hiring People with an Internet Presence

Question: What do you think about the dangers of hiring someone with an internet presence? Some people in business have concerns about hiring people active on blogs, social media, and other online forums. Often that’s because of controversial positions advocated by the potential employee that they don’t want to reflect on the company or cause drama internally. Also, they might have concerns that the person would share information about the company (including co-workers) that ought to be be kept private. So what are the principles involved in hiring someone who posts controversial material online? For example, should their potential position in the company matter, such as whether they’ll be working in the back office or with the public? Or, should companies simply ignore what people say and do on their off-time, including on the internet?

My Answer, In Brief: A person’s internet activities can reveal facts relevant to suitability for a job, such as character, personality, interests, and judgment. To that extent, as well as for other matters relevant to the work, a person’s online activities are of interest to a current or potential employer.

Listen or Download:

To comment on this question or my answer, visit its comment thread.

Question 3: The Morality and Limits of Revenge

Question: Is revenge ever moral? In a famous song, singer Carrie Underwood describes trashing her boyfriend’s truck after she finds out that he cheated on her. Is it ever moral to seek out revenge like this on someone who has lied to you or has done something for which there are no real legal repercussions? What are the limits of moral revenge, if any?

My Answer, In Brief: It’s never moral to violate a person’s rights, including property rights. In addition, it’s self-destructive to focus on getting one’s revenge. Instead, exercise your right to free association – and cut the person out of your life so that you can pursue goals and projects that matter to you.

Listen or Download:

Links:

To comment on this question or my answer, visit its comment thread.

Question 4: Building Codes

Question: Are building codes ethical? In light of the building earthquake and tsunami in Japan, a lot of people are crediting the strict building codes and urban planning for reducing the damage. Is it proper to support building codes, which limit property rights, if the goal is to prevent damage and destruction in the event of an inevitable natural disaster, such as an earthquake?

My Answer, In Brief: Again, it’s never moral to violate a person’s rights, including property rights. Building codes are neither effective nor necessary means to protect people and property in natural disasters.

Listen or Download:

To comment on this question or my answer, visit its comment thread.

Question 5: Numbers of Men Versus Women in Objectivism

Question: Why are more men than women attracted to Objectivism? More men than women seem to be attracted to Ayn Rand’s philosophy of Objectivism. Why is that? And does it matter?

My Answer, In Brief: Presumably, more men are attracted to Objectivism than women for the same reason that more men are attracted to philosophy than women. Those reasons may be due to innate differences or cultural influences, yet ultimately, they reflect people’s choices. However, the gender gap is not nearly as wide today as it used to be.

Listen or Download:

To comment on this question or my answer, visit its comment thread.

Question 6: Wealth Creation

Question: Why is wealth not a zero-sum game? If someone makes a profit, doesn’t that mean that someone else loses?

My Answer, In Brief: Values are not mere material things: they can be created and destroyed – and they are increased by voluntary trade. As such, profits are the creation of value, not merely the extraction of values from other people.

Listen or Download:

Links:

To comment on this question or my answer, visit its comment thread.

Conclusion

Be sure to check out the topics scheduled for upcoming episodes! Don’t forget to submit and vote on questions for future episodes too!

  • Start Time: 58:24


About Philosophy in Action Radio

Philosophy in Action Radio focuses on the application of rational principles to the challenges of real life. It broadcasts live on most Sunday mornings and many Thursday evenings over the internet. For information on upcoming shows, visit the Episodes on Tap. For podcasts of past shows, visit the Show Archives.

Philosophy in Action's NewsletterPhilosophy in Action's Facebook PagePhilosophy in Action's Twitter StreamPhilosophy in Action's RSS FeedsPhilosophy in Action's Calendar


 Podcast #74: Prisoner’s Dilemma, Revenge, Building Codes, and More  Add comments
   
Home | Live | Podcasts | Blog | Queue | Connect | Contribute | Search
Copyright Diana Hsieh | Web | Email | Twitter | Facebook

Philosophy in Action's NewsletterPhilosophy in Action's Facebook PagePhilosophy in Action's Twitter StreamPhilosophy in Action's RSS FeedsPhilosophy in Action's Calendar
Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha