New Questions in the Queue

 Posted by on 29 June 2012 at 7:30 am  Question Queue
Jun 292012
 

As you know, on Sunday morning’s Philosophy in Action Radio, I answer four questions chosen in advance from the Question Queue. Here are the most recent additions to that queue. Please vote for the ones that you’re most interested in hearing me answer! You can also review and vote on all pending questions sorted by date or sorted by popularity.

FYI, I’m perfectly willing to be bribed to answer a question of particular interest to you pronto. So if you’re a regular contributor to Philosophy in Action’s Tip Jar, I can answer your desired question as soon as possible. (The question must already be in the queue, so if you’ve not done so already, submit it. Just e-mail me at [email protected] to make arrangements.

Now, without further ado…

Should parents make empty threats to their children?

At the grocery store last week, I heard a mother threaten to throw away her daughter’s favorite toys unless the daughter behaved. That seems to be pretty common: parents make empty threats in an attempt to scare their kids into better behavior. They’ll say that it works, and perhaps it does. But what are the consequences? Are such empty threats a valid parenting technique?

How would the government protect the safety of food and drugs in a free society?

Would the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) exist in free society? If so, would food or drugs have to gain FDA approval to be sold? Would it have the power to remove food or drugs deemed unsafe from the market? If not, what would protect consumers from harm due to adulterated or otherwise unsafe food or drugs?

What is the value of marriage?

What is the value of marriage? How is it different from living with a romantic partner in a committed relationship? Is marriage only a legal matter? Or does it have some personal or social benefit?

Is it wrong for an atheist to refuse to attend a sibling’s religious ceremony?

I’ve decided not to attend the religious ceremony of my younger sister’s upcoming Bat Mitzvah. I’m an atheist, and while I don’t think attending would be immoral, I don’t want to support any kind of religiosity or connection to religion. Other family members have criticized me for that decision, saying that I should support my sister and not pressure her into agreeing with my own views. Should I attend? If not, how should I handle the family dynamics?

What is the relationship between personality and sense of life?

What is the difference between them? How does a person’s sense of life relate to his personality? Does understanding someone’s sense of life help us to understand his personality and vice versa?

What should a person do when part of his job involves dealing with looters?

I work for a company that promotes other companies. One of those promoted companies is extremely large, and it was bailed out with taxpayer money in 2009. In my view, my employer is profiting from theft. I’m having a terrible time dealing with this situation, and resent my job everytime I’m expected to perform for this customer. Is there another way that I can look at this situation so that it won’t be so distressing? Or is there something else that I could or should do?

Is it wrong to invent stories about yourself to tell to strangers?

In the past, I’ve made up stories about myself (basically assuming a character) and told them to strangers on the bus or in an airport. When I mentioned this to my spouse, I hadn’t really thought of this as lying until I saw his horrified reaction. Do you think this is wrong? If so, why? Would it be acceptable in some contexts, such as for an acting class?

Should minor girls be required by law to obtain parental consent for an abortion?

Normally, parents are legally empowered to make medical decisions for their minor children, and minors cannot obtain medical procedures without parental consent. How should that apply in the case of pregnancy? Should pregnancy and abortion be treated differently from other medical conditions? Should parents be allowed by law to force a daughter under 18 to carry a pregnancy to term or to abort against her will? Should minor teenagers be granted more power over their medical decisions? Should the law grant exemptions in cases of potential abuse or neglect if the pregnancy or abortion were discovered?

Should a person feel guilty for not acting selfishly enough?

According to rational egoism, a person ought to act selfishly – not in the sense of hurting others, but in the sense of pursuing his own good. If a person fails to do that, should he feel guilty for failing to act morally?

Is it moral to knowingly ignore or violate a website’s terms of service?

Suppose that during the sign up process for a website you are presented with some terms of service and a checkbox indicating that you have read them, and that the checkbox is disabled until you’ve scrolled to the bottom of the terms. Leaving aside the question of whether the terms should be enforceable in a court of law, is it moral to simply scroll to the bottom and click the checkbox without reading, or to later do something that you know was expressly prohibited by the terms? If so, what kind of obligations do you have when the terms aren’t presented so unambiguously (e.g. there’s just a link in the site footer that says “terms of service”) or are filled with complicated legalese? If not, is there (or should there be) any way for a site owner to communicate the terms of using the site, or does putting an HTTP server on the public network thereby permit anyone in as long as there are no technical barriers put in place?

Can open relationships be moral?

Can it ever be moral to have sex with someone else while in a relationship, assuming that you’re honest with everyone involved? If not, why not? If so, what might be some of the pitfalls to be aware of? For example, should the criteria for selecting sexual partners be stricter than if you were single? How should you navigate the tricky territory of opening a previously closed relationship? How might personality differences (especially with respect to sex and intimacy) affect the relationships?

When should a person speak up against bigotry toward gays?

My boyfriend and I were at a party at the home of one of his coworkers. One person at the party started using offensive homophobic slurs, so I asked him not to use that kind of language. He persisted, and the conversation escalated into an argument. My boyfriend did not take a position, and he later said he “didn’t want to get involved” and that it had been “none of my business” to stick my neck out against the bigot. I believe that silence implies acceptance. Though there may not be a moral obligation to intervene, it still seems like the right thing to do. What is the moral principle behind this? Is it important enough to end a relationship over?

How should I respond to an unwanted gift given by my in-laws?

My in-laws often give me presents that I don’t much like – like frumpy boring sweaters and books I’ll never read. I thank them kindly for the present, but I’m not effusive in my praise. Recently, they gave me something really pretty inappropriate for me – on par with giving a bacon cookbook to a vegetarian. I wasn’t sure whether it was just clueless or hostile. How should I respond?

How can I estimate the time required for work more accurately?

I’m self-employed, and I’m routinely frustrated by my inability to estimate how much time a project will require of me. For example, I’ll think that a programming project will require two days, but by the time I’m done with all the little unexpected details, I’ve spent five days on it. How can I be more accurate in my estimates?

Should I flirt with my friends?

I tend to be physically reserved around my friends, not touching them or otherwise physically displaying affection. Should I try to be more expressive? What would be too much? Are some of my friends giving the wrong impression by being flirty with their friends?

To submit a question, use this form. I prefer questions on some concrete real-life problem, as opposed to merely theoretical or political questions. I review and edit all questions before they’re posted. (Alas, IdeaInformer doesn’t display any kind of confirmation page when you submit a question.)

 

My OpEd on the Supreme Court ObamaCare ruling is now up at PJMedia:

What Should Americans Do After the Supreme Court ObamaCare Ruling?

Theme: Now that SCOTUS has ruled, we will have to reclaim our freedoms at the ballot box.

My three takehome points:

1) American health care will be in deep trouble in just a few years.

2) There are plenty of good ideas for free market health care reform.

3) ObamaCare must be defeated politically.

We will have our work cut out for us.

 

On Wednesday’s episode of Philosophy in Action Radio, I interviewed parents Jenn Casey and Kelly Elmore about “Parenting without Punishment.” The podcast of that episode is now available for streaming or downloading.

Remember, you can automatically download podcasts of Philosophy in Action Radio by subscribing to Philosophy in Action’s Podcast RSS Feed:


Podcast: 27 June 2012

Many parents think that they can only teach their children proper behavior by imposing punishments and rewards. Such methods, however, often teach the child the wrong lesson. In contrast, Jenn Casey and Kelly Elmore advocate a parenting method known as “positive discipline,” which involves setting and enforcing limits, but not punishment and rewards. How does that work? Why does it work?

Jenn Casey and Kelly Elmore advocate non-punitive discipline in their podcast Cultivating the Virtues. They practice its techniques on their own children daily.

Listen or Download:

Topics:

  • What it means to “parent without punishment
  • Parenting without punishment for toddlers
  • Dealing with dishonesty in kids
  • Kids wanting praise
  • Kids who won’t go to sleep
  • Positive discipline from birth
  • Setting limits based on adult preferences
  • Teenagers breaking curfew
  • What’s wrong with rewards
  • Summing up

Links:

Remember the Tip Jar!

The mission of Philosophy in Action is to spread rational principles for real life… far and wide. That’s why the vast majority of my work is available to anyone, free of charge. I love doing the radio show, but each episode requires an investment of time, effort, and money to produce. So if you enjoy and value that work of mine, please contribute to the tip jar. I suggest $5 per episode or $20 per month, but any amount is appreciated. In return, contributors can request that I answer questions from the queue pronto, and regular contributors enjoy free access to premium content and other goodies.


About Philosophy in Action Radio

Philosophy in Action Radio focuses on the application of rational principles to the challenges of real life. It broadcasts live on most Sunday mornings and many Thursday evenings over the internet. For information on upcoming shows, visit the Episodes on Tap. For podcasts of past shows, visit the Show Archives.

Philosophy in Action's NewsletterPhilosophy in Action's Facebook PagePhilosophy in Action's Twitter StreamPhilosophy in Action's RSS FeedsPhilosophy in Action's Calendar


Wildfire Evacuation Tips

 Posted by on 26 June 2012 at 10:30 pm  Colorado, Emergencies, Wildfires
Jun 262012
 

Waldo Canyon FireBack in April, my neighborhood riding club hosted an excellent presentation by Fran Santagata of the Douglas County Sheriff’s Office on emergency preparedness, particularly for wildfires. I’ve been through two major fires before, so I thought that I was pretty well-informed. To my surprise, I learned far more than expected.

Given the numerous wildfires currently burning along Colorado’s Front Range, I thought I’d post my notes from the presentation. I didn’t take notes on everything, just on points that I found particularly important or that I didn’t already know. Those notes are below.

We’re living in a damned tinderbox here in Colorado right now. It’s dry as a bone, terribly hot, and often terribly windy. The conditions are the worst possible.

At present, none of the fires threaten Paul and me. They’ve all been an hour north or south, but something could blow up in our neighborhood in very short order. (Our neighborhood isn’t forested, but we have lots of scrub oak.) Paul and I are busy making evacuation preparations, now that we’ve returned from Los Angeles. The risk is so high, and we might have just a few moments to pack up ourselves and our beasts.

Make a Plan

  • Create a 72-hour kit
  • Identify valuables to take
  • Develop a communication plan for your family
  • Select a default meeting place for your family
  • Figure out where to stay if you’re evacuated
  • Find hotels that accept pets

Prepare Your House

  • Create breaks in the vegetation, so that the home can be defended
  • Identify and address potential combustibles, including firewood, decks, and gutters
  • Ask your local fire department to inspect your property
  • Beware of the “ladder fuels” from small bushes to trees to the house
  • Add a flag to identify the location of the septic tank

When a Fire Hits

  • 1pm to 5 pm is the prime fire danger time
  • Close your windows and doors
  • Remove your drapes
  • Leave the water hoses hooked up
  • Open your driveway gates: give emergency vehicles access
  • Leave a note on the door (and gate) with contact information

Notification

  • Sign up to your county sheriff’s alert notification system
  • Follow your local news and sheriff on Facebook and Twitter
  • Be sure to have a phone that doesn’t require power, preferably in the bedroom
  • Call 911 if you see or smell smoke
  • Use a NOAA radio

Route Selection

  • Listen to the directions in the notification carefully
  • Know the alternate routes out of your neighborhood, including emergency access roads
  • Know where the shelters will be for humans and animals (e.g. fairgrounds)

What To Take

  • Humans and animals first — everything else can be replaced
  • Heirlooms, mementos, photos, computers, important papers
  • Clothes, toiletries, medications
  • Food and medications for your animals

Be Safe

  • Drive slowly! Think clearly! Be observant!
  • Don’t stop to take pictures
  • Beware of firefighters, wildlife, pets, falling trees, and more

Evacuation

  • Evacuations might be done in stages — or not
  • Follow the instructions of law enforcement on the ground
  • The shelter will be a good source of up-to-date information
  • Do not lock the house, if you’re comfortable with that: firefighters and law enforcement might need access, including to save their own lives

Returning Home

  • Expect some psychological trauma

Other Tasks

  • Take pictures of the house and stuff for insurance
  • Find ways to identify your animals (e.g brand or microchip)
  • If you have special needs, get registered on the special needs registry
  • Do no rely on the county to transport your animals (e.g. horses)
  • Identify multiple backup plans
  • Check insurance for wildfire protection

If you have any additional tips, please post them in the comments!

Polar Bear Facepalm

 Posted by on 25 June 2012 at 2:00 pm  Animals, Funny
Jun 252012
 

Sometimes, even the polar bear can’t take the insanity any longer:

Jun 252012
 

On Sunday’s episode of Philosophy in Action Radio, Greg Perkins and I answered questions on corporal punishment of kids, parenting as a central purpose, compartmentalized cheating, something greater than yourself, and more. The podcast of that episode is now available for streaming or downloading.

You can automatically download podcasts of Philosophy in Action Radio by subscribing to Philosophy in Action’s Podcast RSS Feed:


Whole Podcast: 24 June 2012

Listen or Download:

Remember the Tip Jar!

The mission of Philosophy in Action is to spread rational principles for real life… far and wide. That’s why the vast majority of my work is available to anyone, free of charge. I love doing the radio show, but each episode requires an investment of time, effort, and money to produce. So if you enjoy and value that work of mine, please contribute to the tip jar. I suggest $5 per episode or $20 per month, but any amount is appreciated. In return, contributors can request that I answer questions from the queue pronto, and regular contributors enjoy free access to premium content and other goodies.


Podcast Segments: 24 June 2012

You can download or listen to my answers to individual questions from this episode below.

Introduction

My News of the Week: I’m on vacation, and alas, that affects the audio quality for the worse.

Question 1: Corporal Punishment of Kids

Question: Is corporal punishment of children ever proper? The 2011 video of Judge William Adams beating his daughter raises the question of whether it’s ever necessary or proper to physically discipline children. Does the age of the child matter, particularly given that you can’t reason with younger children? Does the amount of force used matter? When does physical punishment violate the child’s rights?

My Answer, In Brief: To force obedience on your weak and dependent children by violence is immoral and impractical.

Listen or Download:

Links:

To comment on this question or my answer, visit its comment thread.

Question 2: Parenting as a Central Purpose

Question: Can parenting be a central purpose in life? Many people think that only a career can serve as a person’s central purpose. They think that a central purpose must be remunerative, and that it can’t be merely temporary. Is that right? Can parenting be a person’s central purpose, even if only for a few years?

My Answer, In Brief: The notion of “central purpose” seems to be misused by many Objectivists: it refers to a person’s productive work, not a specific theme thereof. Parenting is a productive activity, and it can be a person’s primary productive activity.

Listen or Download:

Links:

To comment on this question or my answer, visit its comment thread.

Question 3: Compartmentalized Cheating

Question: Is it true that, “if you cheat on your wife, you’ll cheat on your business partner”? A few months ago, a Republican presidential candidate said of Newt Gingrich, “if you cheat on your wife, you’ll cheat on your business partner.” Leaving aside the specifics of any particular politician’s personal life, is the broader principle accurate? If you knew that someone cheated on his wife, does that mean he should be regarded as an untrustworthy for a business partnership? Or as morally unfit to be your doctor? Or as unfit to be an elected official?

My Answer, In Brief: Depending on the person’s motive for the affair, the cheating might be compartmentalized or infect other areas of his life.

Listen or Download:

To comment on this question or my answer, visit its comment thread.

Question 4: Something Greater than Yourself

Question: Doesn’t everyone need to be a part of something greater than themselves? Most people want to be involved with some cause greater than themselves – whether God, their community, the state, the environment. Doesn’t everyone need that to help steer them in life? Or do you think that’s unnecessary or even wrong?

My Answer, In Brief: A person doesn’t need a cause greater than himself: he needs to value his own life, find inspiration in the great deeds of others, and accomplish great things himself.

Listen or Download:

Links:

To comment on this question or my answer, visit its comment thread.

Rapid Fire Questions

Questions:

  • Should the exclusionary rule be abolished?
  • Are companies morally responsible for the working conditions of their suppliers?
  • Is a sex offender registry just and proper?

Listen or Download:

  • Start Time: 54:17
  • Duration: 11:16
  • Download: MP3 Segment

To comment on these questions or my answers, visit its comment thread.

Conclusion

Be sure to check out the topics scheduled for upcoming episodes! Don’t forget to submit and vote on questions for future episodes too!

  • Start Time: 1:05:34


About Philosophy in Action Radio

Philosophy in Action Radio focuses on the application of rational principles to the challenges of real life. It broadcasts live on most Sunday mornings and many Thursday evenings over the internet. For information on upcoming shows, visit the Episodes on Tap. For podcasts of past shows, visit the Show Archives.

Philosophy in Action's NewsletterPhilosophy in Action's Facebook PagePhilosophy in Action's Twitter StreamPhilosophy in Action's RSS FeedsPhilosophy in Action's Calendar


Activism Recap

 Posted by on 24 June 2012 at 1:00 pm  Activism Recap, Uncategorized
Jun 242012
 

This week on The Blog of Modern Paleo:

Follow Modern Paleo on Facebook and Twitter.


This week on We Stand FIRM, the blog of FIRM (Freedom and Individual Rights in Medicine):

Follow FIRM on Facebook and Twitter.


This week on Politics without God, the blog of the Coalition for Secular Government:

Follow the Coalition for Secular Government on Facebook and Twitter.


This week on Mother of Exiles:

Follow Mother of Exiles on Facebook and Twitter.


This week on The Blog of The Objective Standard:

Follow The Objective Standard on Facebook and Twitter.

Open Thread #348

 Posted by on 24 June 2012 at 10:00 am  Open Thread
Jun 242012
 

It's all about love

For anyone wishing to ask a question, make a observation, or share a link with other NoodleFood readers, I hereby open up the comments on this post to any respectable topic. As always, please refrain from posting inappropriate comments such as personal attacks, pornographic material, copyrighted material, and commercial solicitations.

NoodleFood’s Open Threads feature creative commons photographs from Flickr that I find interesting. I hope that you enjoy them!

Drive Recklessly!

 Posted by on 22 June 2012 at 2:00 pm  Funny
Jun 222012
 

I’m considering contributing to this campaign to drive recklessly:

A Few Updates

 Posted by on 21 June 2012 at 2:00 pm  Announcements
Jun 212012
 

I’ve been making some changes, and I thought I should create a single post about them. Here goes:

(1) I’ve created an account with VigLink to monetize my NoodleFood posts. It looks like a pretty nifty — meaning, easy for me and not intrusive for you — way to earn a bit of money from products I like. You can opt out if you prefer. If you have problems with it, please let me know!

(2) You can now hear Philosophy in Action Podcasts on Stitcher SmartRadio. Stitcher is an app for mobile devices that enables you to listen to your favorite news, talk, and podcasts on demand… including Philosophy in Action!

You can find Stitcher in your app store or at Stitcher.com. I’ve not had a chance to play around with it much yet, but I’d love to hear any feedback on whether you like it or not!

PodcastAlley.com Feeds (3) I’ve also added the Philosophy in Action Podcast to Podcast Alley, so if you use that, please vote and comment on the enhanced M4A version and the standard MP3 version. (They’re the exact same content, just different file formats.)

You can also rate and review the podcast in iTunes: Enhanced M4A Version and Standard MP3 Version.

If you’ve rated and reviewed already… Thank You, Thank You!

(4) I’ve signed up for Audible’s podcast sponsor program, which means that I can offer you the extra-special deal of a free 30 day subscription. As I often mention, I love audiobooks, and it’s a moral crime to pay full price for them!

Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha