Henri is a French cat suffering from existentialist boredom:
Here Henri is again, now suffering from existential angst:
Henri is a French cat suffering from existentialist boredom:
Here Henri is again, now suffering from existential angst:
On Sunday’s episode of Philosophy in Action Radio, Greg Perkins and I answered questions on the wrong of utilitarianism, the morality of working a government job, optimal planning, padding your application, and more. The podcast of that episode is now available for streaming or downloading.
You can automatically download podcasts of Philosophy in Action Radio by subscribing to Philosophy in Action’s Podcast RSS Feed:
Listen or Download:
- Duration: 1:02:34
- Download: Enhanced M4A File (15.2 MB)
- Download: Standard MP3 File (14.3 MB)
The mission of Philosophy in Action is to spread rational principles for real life… far and wide. That’s why the vast majority of my work is available to anyone, free of charge. I love doing the radio show, but each episode requires an investment of time, effort, and money to produce. So if you enjoy and value that work of mine, please contribute to the tip jar. I suggest $5 per episode or $20 per month, but any amount is appreciated. In return, contributors can request that I answer questions from the queue pronto, and regular contributors enjoy free access to premium content and other goodies.
You can download or listen to my answers to individual questions from this episode below.
My News of the Week: My first episode of Philosophy in Action Radio was so much fun! Join me for the next show on Wednesday night at 7 pm MT.
Question: What’s wrong with utilitarianism? The basic principle of utilitarianism is “the greatest happiness for the greatest number.” What’s wrong with that as a moral standard? Shouldn’t a person act for the good of society?My Answer, In Brief: Utilitarianism claims that every person obliged to promote greatest happiness for the greater number. It’s an utterly wrong moral theory based on unjustified hedonism, egalitarianism, and collectivism. When put into practice, the result is massive injustice and misery.
Listen or Download:
- Start Time: 4:04
- Duration: 17:57
- Download: MP3 Segment
- Tags: Collectivism, Egalitarianism, Ethics, Hedonism, Philosophy, Utilitarianism
To comment on this question or my answer, visit its comment thread.
Question: Is it moral to work for the IRS? Is it morally wrong to work for government agencies like the IRS (or equivalent tax bureaus), IAS (Indian Administrative Services), or the EPA? I’m an advocate of free markets. Would I be a hypocrite to work for such illegitimate government agencies?My Answer, In Brief: The morality of working for an illegitimate government agency depends on the kind of work that you’ll be done. In many cases, far better to be on welfare.
Listen or Download:
- Start Time: 22:02
- Duration: 9:48
- Download: MP3 Segment
- Tags: Career, Ethics, Government, Integrity, Work
To comment on this question or my answer, visit its comment thread.
Question: How much advance planning is optimal? Some people like to plan everything well in advance, while others prefer to allow events to unfold and make decisions on the fly. Is one approach better than the other? How much does it depend on the circumstances? How can people with different preferences coordinate comfortably?My Answer, In Brief: There is a reasonable range of preferences for planning based on personality differences and circumstances, with pathology on both extremes.
Listen or Download:
- Start Time: 31:50
- Duration: 10:01
- Download: MP3 Segment
- Tags: Ethics, Personality, Planning, Psychology
To comment on this question or my answer, visit its comment thread.
Question: Is doing activities just to pad you application or resumé dishonest? Some people work on mastering playing the violin, competing in tennis tournaments, learning calculus, and other activities – not because they have any interest in them or because they think they might develop an interest once tried, but rather because they think these activities will look good on an application or resumé. Is that dishonest? Is it unwise?My Answer, In Brief: A person can make himself a better applicant by various means, and so long as he’s not claiming to have interests or qualities that he doesn’t have, that’s not a moral problem.
Listen or Download:
- Start Time: 41:51
- Duration: 9:52
- Download: MP3 Segment
- Tags: College, Education, Ethics, Honesty, Independence, Integrity, Work
To comment on this question or my answer, visit its comment thread.
Questions:
- Who owns the moon?
- How should I respond to a friend always giving me unsolicited advice?
- Is respecting the rights of others an unchosen obligation?
- Where’s the line between being sensitive to the feelings of others and being second-handed?
- What do you think of the idea of “guilty pleasures”?
Listen or Download:
- Start Time: 51:43
- Duration: 9:50
- Download: MP3 Segment
To comment on these questions or my answers, visit its comment thread.
Be sure to check out the topics scheduled for upcoming episodes! Don’t forget to submit and vote on questions for future episodes too!
Philosophy in Action Radio focuses on the application of rational principles to the challenges of real life. It broadcasts live on most Sunday mornings and many Thursday evenings over the internet. For information on upcoming shows, visit the Episodes on Tap. For podcasts of past shows, visit the Show Archives.
This week on We Stand FIRM, the blog of FIRM (Freedom and Individual Rights in Medicine):
This week on Politics without God, the blog of the Coalition for Secular Government:
This week on Mother of Exiles:
This week on the blog of Modern Paleo:
For anyone wishing to ask a question, make a observation, or share a link with other NoodleFood readers, I hereby open up the comments on this post to any respectable topic. As always, please refrain from posting inappropriate comments such as personal attacks, pornographic material, copyrighted material, and commercial solicitations.
NoodleFood’s Open Threads feature creative commons photographs from Flickr that I find interesting. I hope that you enjoy them!
On Friday, I completed my third sheet of SuperSlow training, i.e. another 16 sessions. By way of background, check out:
I began SuperSlow in early June of 2011, so I’ve been doing it for almost a year now. The sessions are grueling and exhausting, although I’ve definitely learned to limit my post-workout exhaustion by resting and eating for about 20 minutes immediately after my workout. I’m definitely enjoying the progress that I’ve made, particularly getting to 300 pounds on leg press. Mostly, I’m glad that I have the time, energy, and strength required to pursue my chosen sports — skiing, snowboarding, and horse riding — for the sheet pleasure of it. Physical fitness at the price of just 30 minutes once per week, with little muscle soreness, is pretty awesome.
Without further ado, here’s this third sheet. (Click to enlarge.)
Here’s a summary of my progress on various movements, starting from Session 32 from Sheet 2 to Session 48 on Sheet 3. All the machines are Nautilus, except the lower back and the torso rotation. As before, only Leg Press and Lower Back are done every session; all other movements are done every other session.
With this sheet, I pushed myself so hard on the leg press — and made so much progress — that I didn’t make much progress with other movements. For the last three sessions, we switched leg press to the last movement, with the expectation that I’ll be able to make more progress on other movements as a result. (The order of movements makes so much difference in my capacity to make progress!)
Every week:
Every other week:
Every other week:
For this next sheet, I want to focus on making major progress on just a few machines — just as I made so much progress on leg press and leg extension on this sheet. I’m thinking lat pull-down, hip abduction, and hip adduction. I’ll have to ask my trainer if we can move those around to be on different days, so that I can really give them my full power.
Basically, SuperSlow is still working really well for me. I’m making good progress with just one 30-minute session per week, and I’m looking forward to progressing even more in my next 16 sessions of Sheet 4!
P.S. If you decide to try my SuperSlow gym — now TruFit Health — in south Denver, please tell them that I referred you!
This video makes me want to work on my knife skills!
On Wednesday’s episode of Philosophy in Action Radio, I discussed “Getting More Done” with listeners. The podcast of that episode is now available for streaming or downloading.
Remember, you can automatically download podcasts of Philosophy in Action Radio by subscribing to Philosophy in Action’s Podcast RSS Feed:
Do you want to accomplish more? Do you find yourself spinning your wheels or procrastinating on your projects?
Listen or Download:
Topics:
Links:
The mission of Philosophy in Action is to spread rational principles for real life… far and wide. That’s why the vast majority of my work is available to anyone, free of charge. I love doing the radio show, but each episode requires an investment of time, effort, and money to produce. So if you enjoy and value that work of mine, please contribute to the tip jar. I suggest $5 per episode or $20 per month, but any amount is appreciated. In return, contributors can request that I answer questions from the queue pronto, and regular contributors enjoy free access to premium content and other goodies.
Philosophy in Action Radio focuses on the application of rational principles to the challenges of real life. It broadcasts live on most Sunday mornings and many Thursday evenings over the internet. For information on upcoming shows, visit the Episodes on Tap. For podcasts of past shows, visit the Show Archives.
I love a bit of silly, including in work. That’s certainly reflected in my own style of webcasting and blogging. Happily, lots of people enjoy that: I routinely receive e-mails expressing delight that I make exploring ethics and philosophy enjoyable, as opposed to feeling like a burden or a chore.
Recently, I discovered that MailChimp takes their form of silly to a particularly high level of awesome. Let me explain.
MailChimp is an e-mail newsletter service, and I use it for my weekly Philosophy in Action Newsletter. (Not yet subscribed? Gack! Get yourself subscribed today!) I’ve been really pleased with their offerings and prices. (They’re better than Constant Contact, particularly on price.)
I’ve also been entertained by their little touches of irreverence. So in their header, they’ll have their chimp logo say and link to something amusing. For example:
That links to this silly video of Chimpanzee Outtakes.
Even better, the bacon lance:
That links to this awesome video:
So yes, you can turn off the bits of humor in MailChimp. But if you do that, they’re going to poke a bit of fun at you, just one last time. I love it!
Some people, I’m sure, find such humor quite offensive. I’ve noticed that some people seem to think that a person can’t be doing good work unless dead serious. Yet a bit of observation easily proves that false. Particularly in customer service, a touch of humor can brighten a person’s mood and create goodwill. (Think Southwest Airlines!) The same is often true for dealing with co-workers, clients, suppliers, and the like: a touch of benevolent humor can make the work so much more enjoyable.
With the use of humor, a person must aim for that Aristotelian mean — meaning using humor “at the right times, with reference to the right objects, towards the right people, with the right motive, and in the right way.” That “mean” may depend on the individual too, as people differ in their senses of humor — often purely as a matter of personality, not morality. Of course, it’s good to be sensitive to the preferences of others.
So if you think that philosophy or business or politics or romance or sex or parenting or almost any other pursuit in life is TOO IMPORTANT to ever be lightened by benevolent humor… think again. Heck, even dour-faced rationalism can be funny!
Around the time when I answered my webcast question on public breastfeeding, the following fabulously funny image was floating around Facebook. Happily, multiple people posted it on my wall, and it gave me a giggle every time.