Forgiveness, Meaning of Life, Online IP, and More: 16 October 2011: Philosophy in Action

Webcast Q&A: Sunday, 16 October 2011

In the live broadcast of Philosophy in Action Radio on Sunday, 16 October 2011, I answered questions on judging young adults, voting with your wallet, the evidence for free will, the morality of armed rebellion, and more. Greg Perkins of Objectivist Answers was my co-host.

Support
Our WorkRemember, Philosophy in Action Radio is available to anyone, free of charge. That's because our goal is to spread rational principles for real life far and wide, as we do every week to thousands of listeners. We love producing every episode, but each requires requires our time, effort, and money – week in and week out. So if you enjoy and value our work, please contribute to our tip jar. We suggest $5 per episode or $20 per month, but any amount is appreciated. You can send your contribution via Dwolla, PayPal, or US Mail.

My News of the Week: As usual, I've been tending to Dr. Gimpy. I've also been programming for new web site and implementing design by Tori Press of Red Queen Design Studio. It looks so awesome!

Listen Now

Duration: 1:04:51

Download the Episode

To save the file to your computer, right-click and save the link:

Download: Enhanced M4A File (30.6 MB)
Download: Standard MP3 File (29.7 MB)

To automatically download new podcast episodes to your computer, subscribe to the podcast feed of Philosophy in Action:

Enhanced M4A Feed: Subscribe in iTunes or your RSS reader
Standard MP3 Feed: Subscribe in iTunes or your RSS reader

Share This Episode

Segments: 16 October 2011

Question 1: Judging Young Adults (3:22)

Question: How should I judge my college-age peers, given the upbringing they've had? I know that we are ultimately responsible for our actions and our character, yet character is also heavily influenced by our culture, education, and upbringing. I was raised roughly the same way as my peers were, and I went through the same standardized, state-school educational system. Yet I did not end up like them – largely due to the fact that I read Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged. I got to see an alternative to the ideas offered to me, unlike most of my peers. Without that, I could have ended up just like anyone else. Knowing that, I try to treat my peers gently – meaning not taking the bad ideas they hold seriously, showing a benevolent warmth to them, and not focusing too hard on negatively judging their characters. But am I doing right, or should I be harsher in my judgment and treatment of them?

Answer, In Brief: Judging young people fairly requires taking account of their ignorance as they engage in the process of shaping their own souls. You can be kind and just – if you focus on all the relevant facts about the person's context.

Tags: Culture, Education, Ethics, Judgment, Justice, Moral Wrongs, Young Adults

Listen or Download

Comments

Question 2: Voting With Your Wallet (21:24)

Question: Is it wrong to "vote with your wallet"? A liberal friend of mine recently said that he won't vote for political candidates based on his own economic interests – for example, that Candidate A promises to raise taxes on his income bracket, while Candidate B promises to cut taxes for that bracket. He votes based on his agreement with the total political program, not its effects on his paycheck. What's right or wrong with his approach?

Answer, In Brief: To speak of "voting with your wallet" is a horrible package-deal that conflates violations of rights with the protection of rights. A person should vote for politicians based on their in-practice commitment to individual rights.

Tags: Economics, Elections, Ethics, Politics, Voting

Listen or Download

Comments

Question 3: The Evidence for Free Will (30:02)

Question: Is there objective evidence for free will? After doing some research on free will and determinism, the existence of free will seems pretty unlikely to me – even though the thought of free will is comforting. An argument often used to refute determinism is that the determinist says that we should accept determinism, since on his view, he only advocates determinism because he's determined. That seems unsatisfying, however, since that doesn't prove the existence of free will. Also, even if each person can say of himself, "I have free will," how do you determine whether others have free will? How would you know whether a toddler, a teenager, a person with a brain tumor, or a person with dementia has free will or not?

Answer, In Brief: Free will is an inescapable fact about our experience, and claims of determinism are incoherent.

Tags: Free Will, Metaphysics, Philosophy, Science

Listen or Download

Relevant Links

Comments

Question 4: The Morality of Armed Rebellion (48:11)

Question: When is a person (or group) justified in taking up arms against the government? In other words, how despotic must a government be for violent revolution to be morally justified? Before that point, is a person just engaged in "terrorism"?

Answer, In Brief: Armed rebellion would be immoral and impractical at present, given that peaceful political change is still possible.

Tags: Ethics, Law, Politics, Statism, War

Listen or Download

Relevant Links

Comments

Conclusion (1:03:45)

Thank you for joining us for this episode of Philosophy in Action Radio! If you enjoyed this episode, please contribute to contribute to our tip jar.

Support Philosophy in Action

Thank you, if you've contributed to Philosophy in Action! You make our work possible every week, and we're so grateful for that!

If you enjoy Philosophy in Action, please help us spread the word about it! Tell your friends about upcoming broadcasts by forwarding our newsletter. Link to episodes or segments from our topics archive. Share our blog posts, podcasts, and events on Facebook and Twitter. Rate and review the podcast in iTunes (M4A and MP3). We appreciate any and all of that!

About Philosophy in Action Radio

I'm Dr. Diana Hsieh. I'm a philosopher specializing the application of rational principles to the challenges of real life. I received my Ph.D in philosophy from the University of Colorado at Boulder in 2009. My dissertation defended moral responsibility and moral judgment against the doubts raised by Thomas Nagel's "problem of moral luck."

My radio show, Philosophy in Action Radio, broadcasts live over the internet on Sunday mornings and Wednesday evenings. On Sunday mornings, I answer four meaty questions applying rational principles to the challenges of real life in a live hour-long show. Greg Perkins of Objectivist Answers co-hosts the show. On Wednesday evenings, I interview an expert guest about a topic of practical importance.

If you join us for the live broadcasts, you can ask follow-up questions and make comments in the text-based chat. Otherwise, you can listen to the podcast by subscribing to our Podcast RSS Feed. You can also peruse the show archives, where episodes and questions are sorted by date and by topic.

For regular updates, commentary, and humor, read my blog NoodleFood and subscribe to its Blog RSS Feed. Be sure to sign up for our newsletter and connect on social media too.

I can be reached via e-mail to [email protected].